Archive for June, 2011

Is your bequest language easy to find?

Wednesday, June 15th, 2011

Try this.  Google “planned giving”.  Then go to 3 organization’s websites and try to find the bequest language a donor would need to include in their will.

Ok.  Now that you’ve done that, was it easy to find the bequest language on each website? Were you able to find it at all?

Considering the commonly believed opinion that 80%-90% of planned gifts come in the form of bequests, wouldn’t it be a good idea to make sure the proper bequest language is easy to find online for each organization?

Here’s an example of a landing page that has a link to the bequest language front and center.  It also gives donors the opportunity to self-identify whether or not they have left a gift or are considering doing so.

Bequest language

Bequest language front-and-center

Some thoughts about planned giving marketing newsletters.

Sunday, June 12th, 2011

There’s a lot to discuss when it comes to newsletters for planned giving marketing.

planned giving newsletters
A personalized, relevant planned giving newsletter

First, can we agree that just about anyone in your database could be a planned giving prospect?

And let’s add the fact that tons of folks are likely to consider a planned gift for your organization even if they are not in your database.  I was meeting with the Vice President of a hospital system last week and he noted that a large number of the bequests they receive “come out of nowhere.”  Of course, his staff will scour their database to find a link.  But often they can’t find a connection between the organization and the donor.

Having said that, can we assume that anyone in the world could be a planned giving prospect?  Oh my!

So we’ve got to narrow down the list, right?

Some people will mine their data using Blackbaud or another service.  Others will simply try to determine who has been giving somewhat frequently.  For instance, I know a Director of Planned Giving that firmly believes a good planned giving prospect is someone who has donated every year for at least 5 years in a row.

That’s certainly not a bad way to slim down your list.  But I think there’s a better way.  I think organizations should consider a multi-step process that includes an acquisition phase followed by on-going nurturing efforts.

Step 1- Cast a wider net to ultimately create a targeted list for nurturing before sending a newsletter to a mass audience (an acquisition effort)

Step 2- Test frequent donors and infrequent donors to see if it matters

Step 3- Consider other ways to segment your list (for instance, did they volunteer or participate in an event somewhat recently?)

Step 4- Your acquisition effort should attempt to get your prospects to self-identify where they are in the consideration process and what topics interest them

Step 4- Once you’ve determined who is interested, what they are interested in, and where they are in the consideration process… then you should educate them with valuable information sent with enough frequency to make your point without hitting them too often

Step 5- And finally, be sure to send relevant information to each prospective planned giving donor.  Personalized communications engage prospects and deliver more value.  A hit-or-miss, one-size-fits-all newsletter approach sent out to a mass audience is very expensive.  Plus, consider this: would you prefer a newsletter that includes several topics you may or may not want to read about or would you prefer one that gives you information you care about?

So, I recommend spending a decent portion of your marketing budget on acquisition so you can find planned giving prospects that self-identify their interests and where they are in the consideration process.  Then, invest in a smaller but more qualified list. Use the information from the acquisition effort to send frequent, highly-personalized, relevant educational information.

What do you think?

 

Should we avoid the term “planned giving”?

Saturday, June 11th, 2011

I think we should avoid the term “planned giving” in our marketing materials and communications. Donors just don’t understand that phrase.  planned giving

According to Larry Stelter’s July 2009 National Poll, “63 percent of Americans aged 30+ are unfamiliar with the term, although a higher percentage expressed understanding of various ways to make a planned gift. This finding reminds us to think carefully about the words we use to define the work we do and the actions we expect of donors.”   http://www.contributionsmagazine.com/featured/plannedgivingsurvey.html

Instead, why not try “legacy gift”, “bequest”, or even “estate donation”?  If you have other phrases you think work better, please go ahead and post a comment.

Pulling the best list to generate leads for planned giving (charitable estate planning) is not easy.

Monday, June 6th, 2011

Pulling the best list for planned giving marketing is not easy. Planned giving targets are not the same as major gift targets. They are unique because almost anyone can leave a bequest to your organization.planned giving list selection

There are several vendors that can mine your data to add wealth qualifiers and affinity codes to your list. By doing so, they will attempt to tell you who your most likely planned giving donors will be. Some organizations have also used modeling methods with a certain degree of success.

Be judicious when employing these tactics. Studies have found that data mining and wealth qualification practices are not always the only ways to build a qualified list of planned giving targets.

An article in The Chronicle of Philanthropy (April 1, 2009 – New Research Sheds Light On Bequest Giving. http://philanthropy.com/article/article-content/63059/) cited several studies and noted that people who did not have children or grandchildren were, in fact, the most likely to make charitable bequests. Data mining tools do not (or cannot) take into account this tremendous list qualifier. Although some have found that the absence of children is not a predictor of the likelihood of a gift but, rather, a predictor of the relative size of a gift.

The Stelter Company described the following in their report titled “Discovering the Secret Giver” (http://www.stelter.com/pdfs/SecretGiver.Q-A.pdf):

• Most people create wills before age 50
• 7% of Americans over 40 put nonprofits in their will, and another 10% of Americans are good prospects because they say they will definitely, or probably, make a bequest to a charity at some point in time.

Stelter also found some key information that defies conventional wisdom, such as:
• People who have left bequests tend to be younger (65% are age 40-54)
• They are not well educated (45% have only a high school education)

And the most interesting nugget of information that makes wealth qualification tools somewhat less necessary:
• People who have left a bequest earn less than originally thought (70% have a household income under $99,999)

Furthermore, PlannedGiving.com cited similar findings in an online white paper titled “Planned giving marketing secrets revealed” (http://www.plannedgiving.com/blog/wpcontent/uploads/2007/05/pgsecrets.pdf). They recommend “institutional loyalty” above age and wealth as a necessity for list qualification. In other words, those who make frequent contributions or regularly participate in events exhibit “institutional loyalty,” and are more likely to leave a bequest (regardless of their age or size of their nest egg).

Clearly, defining your list for a planned giving marketing effort is not easy.

Why you should add video to your website.

Saturday, June 4th, 2011

Moving pictures and words are unbelievably powerful when combined together. That’s why television was the most powerful medium for so long. Videos are easy to make these days. All you need to do is turn on your webcam or point your phone at yourself and talk for a minute or two. Let people know what you have to say. Plus the search engines love video so it helps your SEO ranking.”

Don’t like to be on camera? Upload a presentation of some PowerPoint slides to your website, blog or SlideShare (www.slideshare.com). It’s fast, easy and a very compelling way to get your message across. And if you upload presentations to SlideShare, you can still get some SEO benefits as long as you remember to add a link back to your main website.

Once you see how easy it is to make video, you’ll be ready to upload them to YouTube.com. This means you can create your own promotional videos and TV commercials that people can view on their laptops and smart phones.

Whether you want to demonstrate your product or service or talk about how you can help humanity, it’s free and very effective.

Plus, if your information is interesting and valuable, people might spread it around making it viral. Always remember to have the video link back to your main website to help your SEO.